Federal Government Withdraws Forgery Charges Against Mike Ozekhome

Prof. Mike Ozekhome

In a significant development in Nigeria's legal landscape, the Federal Government has withdrawn forgery charges against renowned Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), Prof. Mike Ozekhome. The decision, announced on February 24, 2026, at the Federal Capital Territory High Court in Maitama, Abuja, marks the end of a short but intense legal battle that had drawn public attention.

The charges stemmed from allegations related to a property dispute in London involving documents purportedly linked to the late former FCT Minister, General Jeremiah Useni. The Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC) initially filed a three-count charge against Ozekhome on January 16, 2026, accusing him of knowingly presenting forged documents, including a Nigerian international passport, to support ownership claims. The case was later taken over by the Office of the Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF).

During proceedings on February 24, Rotimi Oyedepo, SAN, representing the AGF Lateef Fagbemi, informed Justice Peter Kekemeke that he had instructions to withdraw the charge pursuant to Section 108 of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA), 2015. Oyedepo cited the need for "further instructions" after reviewing the case file. The defense team, led by Paul Erokoro, SAN, did not oppose the application.

Justice Kekemeke granted the withdrawal and struck out the suit, stating: "The charge is hereby withdrawn and accordingly dismissed." This abrupt end to the proceedings has been widely viewed as a vindication for Ozekhome, a prominent constitutional lawyer, human rights advocate, and Life Bencher known for his outspoken views on governance and justice.

The case originated from a London court judgment concerning the disputed property. Ozekhome's legal team had previously described the charges as "malicious" and hastily filed, suggesting political motivations. The swift withdrawal raises questions about the initial prosecution's basis and the role of inter-agency coordination between the ICPC and the AGF's office.

Ozekhome, who hails from Edo State and graduated from the University of Ife (now Obafemi Awolowo University) in 1980, has built a reputation as one of Nigeria's most fearless legal minds. He has represented high-profile clients, including activists and politicians, and frequently critiques government actions through public statements and writings.

This development comes amid other notable events in the region, such as ongoing crackdowns in Enugu State on native doctors accused of ritual practices, as reported by outlets like Sahara Reporters. However, the Ozekhome case stands out for its implications on the rule of law, prosecutorial discretion, and the protection of legal professionals from potentially unfounded charges.

For many observers, the withdrawal underscores the importance of thorough evidence review before pursuing high-stakes criminal cases. It also highlights how quickly fortunes can change in Nigeria's judicial system when higher authorities intervene.

As Ozekhome resumes his practice unencumbered, this episode serves as a reminder of the resilience required in Nigeria's legal profession—and the occasional triumph of due process over prolonged litigation.